Journal
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 717-723Publisher
WILDLIFE DISEASE ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-48.3.717
Keywords
Canis latrans; coyote; fecal flotation; helminths; intestinal parasites; sensitivity
Categories
Funding
- City of Calgary Animal Bylaw Service
- University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (UCVM)
- University of Calgary Department of Biological Sciences
- University of Calgary Department of Ecosystem and Public Health
- Alberta Innovates
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Fecal analysis is commonly used to estimate prevalence and intensity of intestinal helminths in wild carnivores, but few studies have assessed the reliability of fecal flotation compared to analysis of intestinal tracts. We investigated sensitivity of the double centrifugation sugar fecal flotation and kappa agreement between fecal flotation and postmortem examination of intestines for helminths of coyotes (Canis latrans). We analyzed 57 coyote carcasses that were collected between October 2010 and March 2011 in the metropolitan area of Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Before analyses, intestines and feces were frozen at -80 C for 72 hr to inactivate Echinococcus eggs, protecting operators from potential exposure. Five species of helminths were found by postmortem examination, including Toxascaris leonina, Uncinaria stenocephala, Ancylostoma caninum, Taenia sp., and Echinococcus multilocularis. Sensitivity of fecal flotation was high (0.84) for detection of T. leonina but low for Taenia sp. (0.27), E. multilocularis (0.46), and U. stenocephala (0.00). Good kappa agreement between techniques was observed only for T. leonine (0.64), for which we detected also a significant correlation between adult female parasite intensity and fecal egg counts (R-s=0.53, P=0.01). Differences in sensitivity may be related to parasite characteristics that affect recovery of eggs on flotation. Fecal parasitologic analyses are highly applicable to study the disease ecology, of urban carnivores, and they often provide important information on environmental contamination and potential of zoonotic risks. However, fecal-based parasitologic surveys should first assess the sensitivity of the techniques to understand their biases and limitations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available