4.1 Article

Susceptibility of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) to Francisella tularensis and Its Effect on the Epizootiology of Tularemia in an Area Where Both Are Endemic

Journal

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 1316-1320

Publisher

WILDLIFE DISEASE ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-46.4.1316

Keywords

Francisella tularensis ssp holarctica; immunohistochemistry; real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR); tularemia; wildlife; zoonosis

Funding

  1. Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent Istvan University [OTKA-78139, NKB]
  2. Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Francisella tularensis is a highly infectious zoonotic agent causing the disease tularemia. The common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) is considered a pest in eastern Europe, and believed to be a source of human tularemia infections. We examined the role of the common hamster in the natural cycle of tularemia using serologic methods on 900 hamsters and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on 100 hamsters in an endemic agricultural area. We collected 374 Ixodes acuminatus ticks from the hamsters and tested them by real-time PCR. All tests were negative. To examine clinical signs, pathology, and histopathology of acute tularemia infection similar to the natural infection, two hamsters were infected with a large dose of a wild strain of F. tularensis ssp. holarctica. After a short period of apathy, the animals died on the eighth and ninth days postinfection. The pathologic, histopathologtc, and immunohistochemical examination contributed to the diagnosis of septicemia in both cases. Our results confirmed previous findings that common hamsters are highly sensitive to F. tularensis. We conclude that although septicemic hamsters may pose substantial risk to humans during tularemia outbreaks, hamsters in interepizootic periods do not act as a main reservoir of F. tularensis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available