4.1 Article

PREVALENCE OF TETRACYCLINE AND RABIES VIRUS ANTIBODY IN RACCOONS, SKUNKS, AND FOXES FOLLOWING AERIAL DISTRIBUTION OF V-RG BAITS TO CONTROL RACCOON RABIES IN ONTARIO, CANADA

Journal

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 946-964

Publisher

WILDLIFE DISEASE ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-44.4.946

Keywords

Oral vaccination; Procyon lotor; rabid raccoon; rabies; raccoon; raccoon rabies; rabies control; vaccine baits; V-RG

Funding

  1. Ontario Rabies Advisory Committee
  2. Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than 3.6 million baits containing a recombinant vaccinia virus-rabies glycoprotein (V-RG) oral rabies vaccine were aerially or hand-distributed during 1999-2006 in an approximate 4,000-9,000 km(2) area of eastern Ontario, Canada, Lis part of a multitactic approach to control the raccoon variant of rabies. The efficacy of the program was assessed through the collection and testing of > 6,900 animals for bait acceptance and rabies virus-specific antibodies. Raccoon acceptance of rabies vaccine baits was significantly greater (71-83%) in areas baited at a density of 150 baits/km(2) 2 compared to areas baited at 75 baits/km(2) 2 (26-58%), and more raccoons consumed vaccine baits in areas baited with a flight line spacing of 0.75 km (45.3% [321/708]) than with a spacing of 1.5 km (33.8% [108/320]). In addition, greater numbers of raccoons consumed vaccine baits during a drop in September (52.7% [213/404]) as opposed to a June bait drop (34.6% [216/624]). Seropositivity rates for raccoons ranged between 7% and 28% in areas baited at 75/km(2) and 10% to 27% in areas baited at 150/km(2) with statistical differences varying among years and treatments. The last case of raccoon-variant rabies reported in Ontario was in September 2005. The control of raccoon rabies in Ontario has resulted in an estimated $6M to $10M Cdn annual savings in rabies-associated costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available