4.1 Article

Estimation of pathogen concentrations in a drinking water source using hydrodynamic modelling and microbial source tracking

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 358-370

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wh.2012.183

Keywords

Bacteroidales markers; Cryptosporidium; E. coli O157/H7; faecal contamination; norovirus; QMRA

Funding

  1. Graduate School on Environment and Health (Miljo och Halsa Forskarskolan) at Chalmers University of Technology and the University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. Swedish Water and Wastewater Association (Svenskt Vatten)
  3. EU
  4. SVU-project [29-122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The faecal contamination of drinking water sources can lead to waterborne disease outbreaks. To estimate a potential risk for waterborne infections caused by faecal contamination of drinking water sources, knowledge of the pathogen concentrations in raw water is required. We suggest a novel approach to estimate pathogen concentrations in a drinking water source by using microbial source tracking data and fate and transport modelling. First, the pathogen (norovirus, Cryptosporidium, Escherichia coli O157/H7) concentrations in faecal contamination sources around the drinking water source Lake Radasjon in Sweden were estimated for endemic and epidemic conditions using measured concentrations of faecal indicators (E. coli and Bacteroidales genetic markers). Afterwards, the fate and transport of pathogens within the lake were simulated using a three-dimensional coupled hydrodynamic and microbiological model. This approach provided information on the contribution from different contamination sources to the pathogen concentrations at the water intake of a drinking water treatment plant. This approach addresses the limitations of monitoring and provides data for quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) and risk management in the context of faecal contamination of surface drinking water sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available