4.3 Article

Magma degassing process during the eruption of Mt. Unzen, Japan in 1991 to 1995: Modeling with the chemical composition of volcanic gas

Journal

JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH
Volume 175, Issue 1-2, Pages 120-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.03.040

Keywords

volcanic gas; chemical composition; degassing of magma; Mt. Unzen

Funding

  1. Institute of Seismology and Volcanology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the dome-forming eruption in 1991 to 1995 at Mt. Unzen, Japan high temperature volcanic gases were sampled from fumaroles located at the western basement of the dacitic lava dome. Comparing the composition of volcanic gas, the volatile in the pre-eruptive melt of magma and the groundmass of lava, we propose that the volatile in magma was liberated through three different gas separation steps. The first gas separation happened at depth deeper than 3.9 km. The liberated gas traveled along the conduit then discharged as the observed fumarolic gas. The second gas separation took place beneath the lava dome. The liberated gas was discharged on the top of lava dome. The third gas separation occurred near surface in a so called open system degassing process. The large variation in the CO2/H2O ratio of fumarolic gas could be explained by the variation of the bubble fraction in the pre-eruptive melt of magma chamber before the gas separations. The estimated bubble fraction in the melt was less than 1.7 vol.%. Such a low fraction of bubbles in the magma chamber of Mt. Unzen would be one of the reasons why the eruption was non-explosive. The fumarolic gas in the later stage of eruption was enriched in HCl and HF due to the effect of open system degassing of magma, although the gas contained CO2 and H2S with high concentrations. The CO2 and H2S would be derived from a vapor phase of hydrothermal system developed around the conduit. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available