4.3 Article

Frequency tuning of shape perception revealed by classification image analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF VISION
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/18.8.9

Keywords

classification image analysis; ideal observer analysis; shape perception; shape discrimination

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) CREATE Program in Vision Science Applications
  2. NSERC Discovery Grant Program
  3. York University Bridging Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Classification image analysis is a powerful technique for elucidating linear detection and discrimination mechanisms, but it has primarily been applied to contrast detection. Here we report a novel classification image methodology for identifying linear mechanisms underlying shape discrimination. Although prior attempts to apply classification image methods to shape perception have been confined to simple radial shapes, the method proposed here can be applied to general 2-D (planar) shapes of arbitrary complexity, including natural shapes. Critical to the method is the projection of each target shape onto a Fourier descriptor (FD) basis set, which allows the essential perceptual features of each shape to be represented by a relatively small number of coefficients. We demonstrate that under this projection natural shapes are low pass, following a relatively steep power law. To efficiently identify the observer's classification template, we employ a yes/no paradigm and match the spectral density of the stimulus noise in FD space to the power law density of the target shape. The proposed method generates linear template models for animal shape detection that are predictive of human judgments. These templates are found to be biased away from the ideal, overly weighting lower frequencies. This low-pass bias suggests that higher frequency shape processing relies on nonlinear mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available