4.3 Article

Quantifying the effect of intertrial dependence on perceptual decisions

Journal

JOURNAL OF VISION
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/14.7.9

Keywords

perceptual decisions; psychophysics; statistical modeling; serial dependence; internal variability

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [Sachbeihilfe FR 2854/1-1]
  2. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  3. EU
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the Bernstein Computational Neuroscience Programs Berlin [FKZ: 01GQ0414, FKZ: 01GQ1002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the perceptual sciences, experimenters study the causal mechanisms of perceptual systems by probing observers with carefully constructed stimuli. It has long been known, however, that perceptual decisions are not only determined by the stimulus, but also by internal factors. Internal factors could lead to a statistical influence of previous stimuli and responses on the current trial, resulting in serial dependencies, which complicate the causal inference between stimulus and response. However, the majority of studies do not take serial dependencies into account, and it has been unclear how strongly they influence perceptual decisions. We hypothesize that one reason for this neglect is that there has been no reliable tool to quantify them and to correct for their effects. Here we develop a statistical method to detect, estimate, and correct for serial dependencies in behavioral data. We show that even trained psychophysical observers suffer from strong history dependence. A substantial fraction of the decision variance on difficult stimuli was independent of the stimulus but dependent on experimental history. We discuss the strong dependence of perceptual decisions on internal factors and its implications for correct data interpretation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available