4.3 Article

Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey

Journal

JOURNAL OF VISION
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/14.1.6

Keywords

extrafoveal preview benefit; eye movements; transsaccadic; visual search

Categories

Funding

  1. Zegar Family Foundations
  2. David Mahoney Chair at Columbia University
  3. [R01 EY014978-01]
  4. [R24 EY015634-01]
  5. [R01EY017039]
  6. [P30EY019007]
  7. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY014978, P30EY019007, R24EY015634, R01EY017039] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have shown that subjects require less time to process a stimulus at the fovea after a saccade if they have viewed the same stimulus in the periphery immediately prior to the saccade. This extrafoveal preview benefit indicates that information about the visual form of an extrafoveally viewed stimulus can be transferred across a saccade. Here, we extend these findings by demonstrating and characterizing a similar extrafoveal preview benefit in monkeys during a free-viewing visual search task. We trained two monkeys to report the orientation of a target among distractors by releasing one of two bars with their hand; monkeys were free to move their eyes during the task. Both monkeys took less time to indicate the orientation of the target after foveating it, when the target lay closer to the fovea during the previous fixation. An extrafoveal preview benefit emerged even if there was more than one intervening saccade between the preview and the target fixation, indicating that information about target identity could be transferred across more than one saccade and could be obtained even if the search target was not the goal of the next saccade. An extrafoveal preview benefit was also found for distractor stimuli. These results aid future physiological investigations of the extrafoveal preview benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available