4.3 Article

Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment

Journal

JOURNAL OF VISION
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/11.9.9

Keywords

search; eye movements; space and scene perception

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-0819582]
  2. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0819592] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is accumulating evidence that scene context can guide and facilitate visual search (e. g., A. Torralba, A. Oliva, M. S. Castelhano, & J. M. Henderson, 2006). Previous studies utilized stimuli of restricted size, a fixed head position, and context defined by the global spatial configuration of the scene. Thus, it is unknown whether similar effects generalize to natural viewing environments and to context defined by local object co-occurrence. Here, with a mobile eye tracker, we investigated the effects of object co-occurrence on search performance under naturalistic conditions. Observers searched for low-visibility target objects on tables cluttered with everyday objects. Targets were either located adjacent to larger, more visible cue objects that they regularly co-occurred in natural scenes (expected condition) or elsewhere in the display, surrounded by unrelated objects (unexpected condition). Mean search times were shorter for targets at expected locations as compared to unexpected locations. Additionally, context guided eye movements, as more fixations were directed toward cue objects than other non-target objects, particularly when the cue was contextually relevant to the current search target. These results could not be accounted for by image saliency models. Thus, we conclude that object co-occurrence can serve as a contextual cue to facilitate search and guide eye movements in natural environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available