4.6 Review

Ocean acidification risk assessment for Alaska's fishery sector

Journal

PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 71-91

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.07.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program [M11PG00034]
  2. U.S. Department of Commerce
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  4. Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR)
  5. Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL)
  6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Climate Program Office Grant [NA11OAR4310141]
  7. Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks
  8. NOAA's Ocean Acidification Research Program
  9. National Science Foundation (ARC) [1107997]
  10. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management through the University of Alaska Coastal Marine Institute [M08AX12760]
  11. Alaska Ocean Observing System under NOAA [A08NOS4730406, NA11NOS0120020]
  12. NOAA [NA08OAR4320751]
  13. University of Alaska
  14. National Science Foundation Grant [ATM-0628582]
  15. Climate and Energy Decision Making (CEDM) Center
  16. National Science Foundation [SES-0949710]
  17. Energy Foundation Grant [G-0905-11200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The highly productive fisheries of Alaska are located in seas projected to experience strong global change, including rapid transitions in temperature and ocean acidification-driven changes in pH and other chemical parameters. Many of the marine organisms that are most intensely affected by ocean acidification (OA) contribute substantially to the state's commercial fisheries and traditional subsistence way of life. Prior studies of OA's potential impacts on human communities have focused only on possible direct economic losses from specific scenarios of human dependence on commercial harvests and damages to marine species. However, other economic and social impacts, such as changes in food security or livelihoods, are also likely to result from climate change. This study evaluates patterns of dependence on marine resources within Alaska that could be negatively impacted by OA and current community characteristics to assess the potential risk to the fishery sector from OA. Here, we used a risk assessment framework based on one developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to analyze earth-system global ocean model hindcasts and projections of ocean chemistry, fisheries harvest data, and demographic information. The fisheries examined were: shellfish, salmon and other finfish. The final index incorporates all of these data to compare overall risk among Alaska's federally designated census areas. The analysis showed that regions in southeast and southwest Alaska that are highly reliant on fishery harvests and have relatively lower incomes and employment alternatives likely face the highest risk from OA. Although this study is an intermediate step toward our full understanding, the results presented here show that OA merits consideration in policy planning, as it may represent another challenge to Alaskan communities, some of which are already under acute socio-economic strains. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available