4.6 Review

Nonproliferation improvements and challenges presented by small modular reactors

Journal

PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 102-109

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.11.023

Keywords

Small modular reactors; Nuclear nonproliferation; Nuclear safeguards

Funding

  1. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation [12-101167-000-INP]
  2. International Risk Governance Council
  3. Paul Scherrer Institute
  4. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0949710, 1463492] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small modular reactors (SMRs) may provide an energy option that will not emit greenhouse gases. From a commercial point-of-view, SMRs will be suitable to serve smaller energy markets with less developed infrastructure, to replace existing old nuclear and coal power plants, and to provide process heat in various industrial applications. In this paper, we examine how SMRs might challenge and improve the existing nonproliferation regime. To motivate our discussion, we first present the opinions gathered from an international group of nuclear experts at an SMR workshop. Next, various aspects of SMR designs such. as: fissile material inventory, core-life, refueling, burnup, digital instrumentation and controls, underground designs, sealed designs, enrichment, breeders, excess reactivity, fuel element size, coolant opacity, and sea-based nuclear plants are discussed in the context of proliferation concerns. In doing this, we have used publicly available design information about a number of SMR designs (B&W mPower, SVBR-100, KLT-40S, Toshiba 4S, and General Atomics EM2). Finally, a number of recommendations are offered to help alleviate proliferation concerns that may arise due to SMR design features. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available