4.3 Article

An anisotropy of orientation-tuned suppression that matches the anisotropy of typical natural scenes

Journal

JOURNAL OF VISION
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/9.1.35

Keywords

contrast gain control; contrast normalization; horizontal effect; natural scenes; 1/f noise; oblique effect; surround suppression; SOA; masking

Categories

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-03-1-0224]
  2. Kentucky Space Grant Consortium
  3. NASA-EPSCoR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Broadband oriented-noise masks were used to assess the orientation properties of spatial-context suppression in 'general' viewing conditions (i.e., a fixated, large field of 'naturalistic' noise). Suppression was orientation-tuned with a Gaussian shape and bandwidth of 40-that was consistent across test orientation (0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees). Strength of suppression was highly anisotropic following a horizontal effect pattern (strongest suppression at horizontal and least suppression at oblique test orientations). Next, the time course of anisotropic masking was investigated by varying stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). A standard oblique effect anisotropy is observed at long SOAs but becomes a horizontal effect when a noise mask is present within approximately 50 ms of the test onset. The orientation-tuned masking appears to result from an anisotropic gain-control mechanism that pools the weighted responses to the broadband mask, resulting in a changeover from oblique effect to horizontal effect. In addition, the relative magnitude of suppression at the orientations tested corresponds to the relative magnitudes of the content of typical natural scenes at the same orientations. We suggest that this anisotropic suppression may serve to equalize the visual system's response across orientation when viewing typical natural scenes, 'discounting' the anisotropy of typical natural scene content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available