4.6 Article

Computational Reconstruction of Bole1a, a Representative Synthetic Hepatitis C Virus Subtype 1a Genome

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 10, Pages 5915-5921

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.05959-11

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DA024565]
  2. SRRS Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) research is hampered by the use of arbitrary representative isolates in cell culture and immunology. The most replicative isolate in vitro is a subtype 2a virus (JFH-1); however, genotype 1 is more prevalent worldwide and represents about 70% of infections in the United States, and genotypes differ from one another by 31% to 33% at the nucleotide level. For phylogenetic and immunologic analyses, viruses H77 and HCV-1 (both subtype la) are commonly used based on their historic importance. In an effort to rationally design a representative subtype la virus (Bole1a), we used Bayesian phylogenetics, ancestral sequence reconstruction, and covariance analysis on a curated set of 390 full-length human HCV la sequences from GenBank. By design, Bold a contains variations present in widely circulating strains and matches more epitope-sized peptides in a full-genome comparison to subtype la isolates than any other sequence studied. Parallel analyses confirm that selected epitopes from the Bole1a genome were able to elicit a robust T cell response. In a proof of concept for infectivity, the envelope genes (E1 and E2) of Bole1a were expressed in an HIV pseudoparticle system containing HCV envelope genes and HIV nonenvelope genes with luciferase expression. The resulting Bole1a pseudoparticle robustly infected Hep3B cells. In this study, we demonstrate that a rationally designed, fully synthetic HCV genome contains representative epitopes and envelope genes that assemble properly and mediate entry into target cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available