4.6 Article

Inhibition of Marburg Virus Budding by Nonneutralizing Antibodies to the Envelope Glycoprotein

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 24, Pages 13467-13474

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01896-12

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J-GRID)
  2. Global COE Program
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  4. ERATO (Japan Science and Technology Agency)
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Public Health Service
  6. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  7. Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24658252, 10F00109] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The envelope glycoprotein (GP) of Marburg virus (MARV) and Ebola virus (EBOV) is responsible for virus entry into host cells and is known as the only target of neutralizing antibodies. While knowledge about EBOV-neutralizing antibodies and the mechanism for the neutralization of infectivity is being accumulated gradually, little is known about antibodies that can efficiently regulate MARV infectivity. Here we show that MARV GP-specific monoclonal antibodies AGP127-8 (IgG1) and MGP72-17 (IgM), which do not inhibit the GP-mediated entry of MARV into host cells, drastically reduced the budding and release of progeny viruses from infected cells. These antibodies similarly inhibited the formation of virus-like particles (VLPs) consisting of GP, the viral matrix protein, and nucleoprotein, whereas the Fab fragment of AGP127-8 showed no inhibitory effect. Morphological analyses revealed that filamentous VLPs were bunched on the surface of VLP-producing cells cultured in the presence of the antibodies. These results demonstrate a novel mechanism of the antibody-mediated inhibition of MARV budding, in which antibodies arrest unformed virus particles on the cell surface. Our data lead to the idea that such antibodies, like classical neutralizing antibodies, contribute to protective immunity against MARV and that the classical neutralizing activity is not the only indicator of a protective antibody that may be available for prophylactic and therapeutic use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available