4.6 Article

Sequential Immunization with a Subtype B HIV-1 Envelope Quasispecies Partially Mimics the In Vivo Development of Neutralizing Antibodies

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 11, Pages 5262-5274

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02419-10

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 AI087064, P01 AI054564, RR-000163]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [UL1 RR024140 01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A major goal of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine efforts is the design of Envelope (Env)-based immunogens effective at eliciting heterologous or broad neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). We hypothesized that programming the B-cell response could be achieved by sequentially exposing the host to a collection of env variants representing the viral quasispecies members isolated from an individual that developed broad NAbs over time. This ordered vaccine approach (sequential) was compared to exposure to a cocktail of env clones (mixture) and to a single env variant (clonal). The three strategies induced comparable levels of the autologous and heterologous neutralization of tier 1 pseudoviruses. Sequential and mixture exposure to quasispecies led to epitope targeting similar to that observed in the simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)-infected animal from which the env variants were cloned, while clonal and sequential exposure led to greater antibody maturation than the mixture. Therefore, the sequential vaccine approach best replicated the features of the NAb response observed in that animal. This study is the first to explore the use of a collection of HIV-1 env quasispecies variants as immunogens and to present evidence that it is possible to educate the B-cell response by sequential exposure to native HIV-1 quasispecies env variants derived from an individual with a broadened NAb response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available