4.6 Article

Temporal Variations in the Hepatitis C Virus Intrahost Population during Chronic Infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 13, Pages 6369-6380

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02204-10

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intrahost evolution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) holds keys to understanding mechanisms responsible for the establishment of chronic infections and to development of a vaccine and therapeutics. In this study, intrahost variants of two variable HCV genomic regions, HVR1 and NS5A, were sequenced from four treatment-naive chronically infected patients who were followed up from the acute stage of infection for 9 to 18 years. Median-joining network analysis indicated that the majority of the HCV intrahost variants were observed only at certain time points, but some variants were detectable at more than one time point. In all patients, these variants were found organized into communities or subpopulations. We hypothesize that HCV intrahost evolution is defined by two processes: incremental changes within communities through random mutation and alternations between coexisting communities. The HCV population was observed to incrementally evolve within a single community during approximately the first 3 years of infection, followed by dispersion into several subpopulations. Two patients demonstrated this pattern of dispersion for the rest of the observation period, while HCV variants in the other two patients converged into another single subpopulation after similar to 9 to 12 years of dispersion. The final subpopulation in these two patients was under purifying selection. Intrahost HCV evolution in all four patients was characterized by a consistent increase in negative selection over time, suggesting the increasing HCV adaptation to the host late in infection. The data suggest specific staging of HCV intrahost evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available