4.6 Article

Nipah Virus Uses Leukocytes for Efficient Dissemination within a Host

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 15, Pages 7863-7871

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00549-11

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. INSERM
  2. ANR MIME
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  4. [ANR-09-MIEN-018-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nipah virus (NiV) is a recently emerged zoonotic paramyxovirus whose natural reservoirs are several species of Pteropus fruit bats. NiV provokes a widespread vasculitis often associated with severe encephalitis, with up to 75% mortality in humans. We have analyzed the pathogenesis of NiV infection, using human leukocyte cultures and the hamster animal model, which closely reproduces human NiV infection. We report that human lymphocytes and monocytes are not permissive for NiV and a low level of virus replication is detected only in dendritic cells. Interestingly, despite the absence of infection, lymphocytes could efficiently bind NiV and transfer infection to endothelial and Vero cells. This lymphocyte-mediated transinfection was inhibited after proteolytic digestion and neutralization by NiV-specific antibodies, suggesting that cells could transfer infectious virus to other permissive cells without the requirement for NiV internalization. In NiV-infected hamsters, leukocytes captured and carried NiV after intraperitoneal infection without themselves being productively infected. Such NiV-loaded mononuclear leukocytes transfer lethal NiV infection into naive animals, demonstrating efficient virus transinfection in vivo. Altogether, these results reveal a remarkable capacity of NiV to hijack leukocytes as vehicles to transinfect host cells and spread the virus throughout the organism. This mode of virus transmission represents a rapid and potent method of NiV dissemination, which may contribute to its high pathogenicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available