4.6 Article

Functional Divergence among CD103+ Dendritic Cell Subpopulations following Pulmonary Poxvirus Infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 19, Pages 10191-10199

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00892-10

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 AI060642, R01 HL071985]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A large number of dendritic cell (DC) subsets have now been identified based on the expression of a distinct array of surface markers as well as differences in functional capabilities. More recently, the concept of unique subsets has been extended to the lung, although the functional capabilities of these subsets are only beginning to be explored. Of particular interest are respiratory DCs that express CD103. These cells line the airway and act as sentinels for pathogens that enter the lung, migrating to the draining lymph node, where they add to the already complex array of DC subsets present at this site. Here we assessed the contributions of these individual populations to the generation of a CD8(+) T-cell response following respiratory infection with poxvirus. We found that CD103(+) DCs were the most effective antigen-presenting cells (APC) for naive CD8(+) T-cell activation. Surprisingly, we found no evidence that lymph node-resident or parenchymal DCs could prime virus-specific cells. The increased efficacy of CD103(+) DCs was associated with the increased presence of viral antigen as well as high levels of maturation markers. Within the CD103(+) DCs, we observed a population that expressed CD8 alpha. Interestingly, cells bearing CD8 alpha were less competent for T-cell activation than their CD8 alpha(-) counterparts. These data show that lung-migrating CD103(+) DCs are the major contributors to CD8(+) T-cell activation following poxvirus infection. However, the functional capabilities of cells within this population differ with the expression of CD8, suggesting that CD103(+) cells may be divided further into distinct subsets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available