4.6 Article

CD4+ T Cells Are Required for the Priming of CD8+ T Cells following Infection with Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 10, Pages 5256-5268

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01997-08

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Health Service [AI-49428]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of CD4(+) helper T cells in modulating the acquired immune response to herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) remains ill defined; in particular, it is unclear whether CD4(+) T cells are needed for the generation of the protective HSV-1-specific CD8(+)-T-cell response. This study examined the contribution of CD4(+) T cells in the generation of the primary CD8(+)-T-cell responses following acute infection with HSV-1. The results demonstrate that the CD8(+)-T-cell response generated in the draining lymph nodes of CD4(+)-T-cell-depleted C57BL/6 mice and B6-MHC-II-/- mice is quantitatively and qualitatively distinct from the CD8(+) T cells generated in normal C57BL/6 mice. Phenotypic analyses show that virus-specific CD8(+) T cells express comparable levels of the activation marker CD44 in mice lacking CD4(+) T cells and normal mice. In contrast, CD8(+) T cells generated in the absence of CD4(+) T cells express the interleukin 2 receptor alpha-chain (CD25) at lower levels. Importantly, the CD8(+) T cells in the CD4(+)-T-cell-deficient environment are functionally active with respect to the expression of cytolytic activity in vivo but exhibit a diminished capacity to produce gamma interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Furthermore, the primary expansion of HSV-1-specific CD8(+) T cells is diminished in the absence of CD4(+)-T-cell help. These results suggest that CD4(+)-T-cell help is essential for the generation of fully functional CD8(+) T cells during the primary response to HSV-1 infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available