4.6 Article

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Integrates Directly into Naive Resting CD4+ T Cells but Enters Naive Cells Less Efficiently than Memory Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 9, Pages 4528-4537

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01910-08

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-AI058862-06, R01AI058862-04S1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resting CD4(+) T cells restrict human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection at or before reverse transcription, resulting in slower kinetics of reverse transcription. In a previous study, we showed that, despite this restriction at reverse transcription, HIV integration occurs in resting CD4(+) T cells, albeit with slower kinetics. In that study, the resting T cells were a mixture of memory and naive cells. Here we asked whether the more quiescent naive cell subset could be directly infected by HIV and, if so, whether the level of integration in naive cells was comparable to that in memory cells. We found that HIV integrates in the naive subset of resting CD4(+) T cells without prior activation of the cells. The level of integration (proviruses/cell) in naive cells was lower than that in memory cells. This difference between naive and memory cells was observed whether we inoculated the cells with R5 or X4 HIV and could not be explained solely by differences in coreceptor expression. The presence of endogenous dendritic cells did not change the number of proviruses/cell in memory or naive cells, and deoxynucleoside pools were equally limiting. Our results instead indicate the existence of a novel restriction point in naive T cells at viral fusion that results in reduced levels of fusion to naive CD4(+) T cells. We conclude that HIV can integrate into both naive and memory cells directly. Our data further support our hypothesis that integrated proviral infection of resting T cells can be established without T-cell activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available