4.6 Article

Oseltamivir-Resistant Influenza A Viruses Are Transmitted Efficiently among Guinea Pigs by Direct Contact but Not by Aerosol

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 20, Pages 10052-10058

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01226-08

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH Center for Investigating Viral Immunity and Antagonism [1UC19 AI062623-023]
  2. NIH Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis [HHSN266200700010C]
  3. NIH [UO1 AI070469, UO1 AI1074539]
  4. National Research Service Award for Physician- Scientist Research Training in the Pathogenesis of Viral Diseases [T32 AI007623]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influenza viruses resistant to the neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor oseltamivir arise under drug selection pressure both in vitro and in vivo. Several mutations in the active site of the viral NA are known to confer relative resistance to oseltamivir, and influenza viruses with certain oseltamivir resistance mutations have been shown to transmit efficiently among cocaged ferrets. However, it is not known whether NA mutations alter aerosol transmission of drug-resistant influenza virus. Here, we demonstrate that recombinant human influenza A/H3N2 viruses without and with oseltamivir resistance mutations (in which NA carries the mutation E119V or the double mutations E119V I222V) have similar in ovo growth kinetics and infectivity in guinea pigs. These viruses also transmit efficiently by the contact route among cocaged guinea pigs, as in the ferret model. However, in an aerosol transmission model, in which guinea pigs are caged separately, the oseltamivir-resistant viruses transmit poorly or not at all; in contrast, the oseltamivir-sensitive virus transmits efficiently even in the absence of direct contact. The present results suggest that oseltamivir resistance mutations reduce aerosol transmission of influenza virus, which could have implications for public health measures taken in the event of an influenza pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available