Journal
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 24-41Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.04.002
Keywords
Hypersonics; Scramjet; Cavity; Flameholding; Supersonic combustion; Unsteady flows
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recesses in the walls of supersonic combustion chambers - cavities - have emerged as a preferred flameholding device since they are non-intrusive, hence resulting in reduced drag, lower total pressure losses and minimal aerodynamic heating when compared with other means of piloting core combustion such as, for example, struts. The flowfield within and in the vicinity of a cavity is complex involving a strong coupling between hydrodynamics and acoustics. When employed as a flameholding device both fuel injection and heat release - which is closely coupled to local mixing processes - alter the flowfield and further complicate the interaction between the cavity and the core supersonic flow. The complexity of this flowfield makes the identification of the dominant flameholding mechanisms and prediction of flame stability limits substantially more difficult than in the case of premixed systems. The following sections review the current knowledge of the mechanics of cavity-based flameholding in supersonic flows. Aspects of the non-reacting and reacting cavity flowfield are discussed with particular emphasis on the impact of fuel injection location relative to the flameholder. Results obtained to date in the attempt to describe the operability of cavity flameholders in terms of experimentally determined flame stability limits are also presented. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available