4.4 Article

Flow cytometry-based assay to study HIV-1 gp120 specific antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 107-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.08.003

Keywords

HIV-1; ADCC responses; gp120 Env; FACS-based method; ADCC-mediating antibodies

Funding

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation Program Leader [29866]
  2. CIHR Operating Grants [119334, 134117]
  3. FRQS Establishment of Young Scientist Grant [26702]
  4. CIHR catalyst Grant [126630]
  5. FRQS AIDS and Infectious Diseases Network
  6. Canada Research Chair on Retroviral Entry
  7. CIHR Fellowship award [135349]
  8. CIHR Doctoral Research Award [291485]
  9. COPSE award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased attention on the role of Fc-mediated effector functions against HIV-1 has led to renewed interest into the role that antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) could play in controlling viral transmission and/or the rate of disease progression. While (51)Chromium release assays have traditionally been used to study ADCC responses against HIV-1, a number of alternative flow-cytometry-based assays were recently developed. In this study, an alternative flow-cytometry-based assay was established to allow non-radioactive measurement of ADCC-mediated elimination of HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein (Env)-coated target cells. This assay relies on staining target and effector cells with different dyes, which allows precise gating and permits the calculation of the number of surviving target cells by normalization to flow-cytometry particles. By using small concentrations of recombinant gp120 Env, suitable targets cells that recapitulate the ADCC response mediated against HIV-1-infected cells were generated. Finally, this method was applied successfully to screen human sera for ADCC activity directed against HIV-1 gp120 Env. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available