4.4 Article

Improved dual promotor-driven reverse genetics system for influenza viruses

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 193, Issue 2, Pages 603-610

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.07.021

Keywords

Influenza virus; Cloning vector; Reverse genetic systems

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01 XI 1006E]
  2. German-Egyptian Research Long-Term Scholarship GERLS program
  3. Egyptian government
  4. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reverse genetic systems for influenza A virus (IAV) allow the generation of genetically manipulated infectious virus from a set of transfected plasmid DNAs encoding the eight genomic viral RNA segments (vRNA). For this purpose, cDNAs representing these eight vRNA segments are cloned into specific plasmid vectors that allow the generation of vRNA-like transcripts using polymerase I (Poll). In addition, these plasmids support the transcription of viral mRNA by polymerase II (Pol II), leading to the expression of viral protein(s) encoded by the respective transcripts. In an effort to develop this system further, we constructed the bi-directional vector pMPccdB. It is based on pHW2000 (Hoffmann et al., 2000b) but contains additionally (i) the ccdB gene whose expression is lethal for most Escherichia coli strains and therefore used as a negative selection marker and (ii) more efficient AarI cloning sites that flank the ccdB gene on either side. Furthermore, we used a modified one-step restriction/ligation protocol to insert the desired cDNA into the respective pMPccdB vector DNA. Both the use of a negative selection marker and an improved cloning protocol were shown to facilitate the generation of genetically engineered IAV as illustrated in this study by the cloning and rescue of the 2009 pandemic isolate A/Giessen/6/2009 (Gi-H1N1). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available