4.4 Article

Improved duplex RT-PCR assay for differential diagnosis of mixed infection of duck hepatitis A virus type 1 and type 3 in ducklings

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 192, Issue 1-2, Pages 12-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.04.012

Keywords

Duck hepatitis A virus type 1 (DHAV-1); Duck hepatitis A virus type 3 (DHAV-3); Duplex RT-PCR assay; Mixed infection

Funding

  1. Chinese National Natural Sciences Foundation [30871878]
  2. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J08LF07]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shandong Province, China [2010GNC10914]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infection with duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV) causes an acute, rapidly spreading, and fatal disease of young ducklings. DHAV type 1 (DHAV-1) and type 3 (DHAV-3) have been identified in China. In this study, a duplex RT-PCR assay was developed to identify DHAV-1 and DHAV-3 with mixed infection. The method was shown to be high specificity and sensitivity. The minimum detection limit of the method has been determined to be 10 pg total RNA templates extracted from duck liver samples or 10(2) copies viral RNA of DHAV-1 and DHAV-3 respectively. Using the method, from 60 clinical liver samples of 26 duckling flocks in Shandong, Guangdong, Sichuan and Henan provinces of China, 15 (57.7%) flocks were identified as mixed infection of DHAV-1 and DHAV-3, and 9 (34.6%) flocks were DHAV-1 or DHAV-3 single infection. Among them, 38.3% (23/60) of duckling samples were detected as mixed infection of DHAV-1 and DHAV-3, and 48.3% (29/60) of samples were DHAV-1 or DHAV-3 single infection. These results indicated that the improved duplex RT-PCR method provides a rapid and cost-effective laboratory differential diagnosis for mixed infection of DHAV-1 and DHAV-3 in ducklings. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available