4.4 Article

Evaluation study of a portable impedance biosensor for detection of avian influenza virus

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 178, Issue 1-2, Pages 52-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.08.011

Keywords

Avian influenza; Impedance biosensor; Detection; Swab samples; Infected chickens

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA/NRI) [2008-35204-18662, 2009-35603-05063]
  2. NIFA [2009-35603-05063, 582652] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current methods for detection of avian influenza virus (AIV) based on virus culture and RT-PCR are well established, but they are either time consuming or require specialized laboratory facilities and highly trained technicians. A simple, rapid, robust, and reliable test, suitable for use in the field or at the patient's bedside, is urgently needed. In this study, the performance of a newly developed portable impedance biosensor was evaluated by comparison with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) and virus culture for detection of AIV in tracheal and cloaca] swab samples collected from experimentally H5N2 AIV infected chickens. The impedance biosensor system was based on a combination of magnetic nanobeads, which were coated with AIV subtype-specific antibody for capture (separation and concentration) of a target virus, and a microfluidic chip with an interdigitated array microelectrode for transfer and detection of target virus, and impedance measurement of the bio-nanobeads and AI virus complexes in a buffer solution. A comparison of results obtained from 59 swab samples using virus culture, impedance biosensor and rRT-PCR methods showed that the impedance biosensor technique was comparable in sensitivity and specificity to rRT-PCR. Detection time for the impedance biosensor is less than 1 h. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available