4.4 Article

The design and validation of a novel phenotypic assay to determine HIV-1 coreceptor usage of clinical isolates

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 169, Issue 1, Pages 39-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.06.012

Keywords

Chemokine receptor; Luciferase; Pseudovirus; Viral fitness; HIV; Viral tropism; Coreceptor usage; CCR5; CXCR4

Funding

  1. NIH [U87-CD4-CCR5, U87-CD4-CXCR4, RR016482, U01 A1068636, R01 HD037793, R01 HD044391]
  2. Harvard Center for AIDS Research Grant
  3. Burroughs-Wellcome-ASTMH Tropical Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A phenotypic assay to determine coreceptor usage of HIV-1 has been developed for rapid testing of clinical samples. The assay is based on the synthesis of viral stock from full-length env amplicons isolated from patient's plasma. Pseudoviral stock is generated rapidly by using an overlapping PCR method to assemble a CMV promoter to env, followed by co-transfection into producer cells with a HIV plasmid (pNL4-3.Luc.R-E-) containing a non-functional env. The coreceptor used by the viral quasispecies is tested by infection into U87.CD4.CCR5 and U87.CD4.CXCR4 cells. Viral entry is indicated by the expression of the luciferase gene in relative light units (RLU). The use of CXCR4 coreceptor by minor variants is confirmed with sufficient suppression of RLU by a CXCR4 inhibitor. Two statistical tests are employed to confirm viral entry. This assay accurately assigned coreceptor usage of isolates of various subtypes and in the majority of samples of various viral loads. The sensitivity to detect minor species of CXCR4-using env is 1% at higher viral loads and 5% at less than 1000 copies/ml. This assay provides a sensitive, efficient and relatively low-cost approach suitable for use by research laboratories for assessing HIV-1 coreceptor usage of plasma samples. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available