4.4 Article

Quantitative one-step real-time RT-PCR for the fast detection of the four genotypes of PPRV

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 165, Issue 2, Pages 168-177

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.01.014

Keywords

Peste des petits ruminants virus; Morbillivirus; Diagnosis; Real-time RT-PCR; Nucleoprotein gene; Proficiency panel

Funding

  1. RP/PPR Markvac project [INCO-CT-2004-003670 (STREP)]
  2. EU [FOOD-CT-2006-016236]
  3. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MAE) [LABOVET 2003-24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A one-step real-time Taqman(R) RT-PCR assay (RRT-PCR) for peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) was developed to detect the four lineages of PPRV by targeting the nucleoprotein (N) gene of the virus. This new assay was compared to a conventional RT-PCR on reference strains and field materials. Quantitation was performed against a standard based on a synthetic transcript of the NPPR gene for which a minimum of 32 copies per reaction were detected with a corresponding C-t value of 39. Depending on the lineage involved, the detection limit of RRT-PCR was decreased by one to three log copies relative to the conventional method. The lower stringency occurred with lineage III because of minor nucleotide mismatches within the probe region. The assay did not detect phylogenetically or symptomatically related viruses of ruminants (such as rinderpest, bluetongue, and bovine viral diarrhea viruses). However, it was capable of detecting 20% more positive field samples with low viral RNA loads compared to the conventional PCR method. When compared on a proficiency panel to the method developed by Bao et al. (2008), the sensitivity of the in-house assay was slightly improved on lineage II. It proved significantly faster to perform and hence better adapted for monitoring large numbers of at risk or diseased animals. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available