4.4 Article

Development and evaluation of a sensitive and quantitative assay for hirame rhabdovirus based on quantitative RT-PCR

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 169, Issue 2, Pages 391-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.08.011

Keywords

Hirame rhabdovirus; Quantitative RT-PCR; TaqMan probe; Diagnostic assay

Funding

  1. China's General Administration for Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) [2009IK002, 2007IK267]
  2. State High-Tech Development Plan of the People's Republic of China [2006AA100306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present work was to develop a quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay using a TaqMan probe to detect and quantify hirame rhabdovirus (HRV). The results demonstrated that the assay had a detection limit of 100 copies of RNA per reaction and a log-linear range up to 10(8) copies of HRV RNA. Regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation with an R-2 value of 0.9963 and a slope of -3.18 between the mean C-t values and HRV cRNA. This assay was 100 times more sensitive than the conventional one-step RT-PCR assay. The qRT-PCR assay was found to be highly reproducible with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 0.37-1.72% and 1.37-3.79%, respectively. The primers and TaqMan probe were specific for HRV and did not react with either the spring viraemia of carp virus (SVCV), infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV), marine birnavirus (MABV), viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV), or viral nervous necrosis virus (VNNV). This assay was evaluated using 40 fish samples, indicating that such method offers considerable advantages over the classical virus isolation method currently used for HRV surveillance. In conclusion, the developed qRT-PCR assay was a reliable, specific and sensitive tool for the quantitative diagnosis of HRV in fish samples. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available