4.4 Article

Detection of HIV-1 in alternative specimen types using the APTIMA® HIV-1 RNA Qualitative Assay

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 159, Issue 1, Pages 10-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.02.015

Keywords

RNA detection; HIV-1; Dried blood spots

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH083552, R01 MH083552-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), saliva, seminal plasma, and dried blood spots were evaluated as specimen types for the APTIMA HIV-1 RNA Qualitative Assay (APTIMA HIV-1 Assay), which employs a target capture step to recover HIV-1-specific sequences from complex specimen types. Analytical sensitivity studies were carried out using samples that were either diluted or eluted with a buffered detergent and spiked with different concentrations of HIV-1 ranging from 1 to 10,000 copies/mL. PBMC samples spiked with HIV-1 had comparable analytical sensitivity to HIV-1 spiked plasma with a 95% limit of detection of 13.1 and 17.2 copies/mL, respectively. Analytical sensitivity in seminal plasma specimens diluted 1:5 and saliva diluted 1:2 was comparable to HIV-1 spiked dilution buffer alone. Whole blood and dried blood spot specimens spiked with HIV-1 had equivalent reactivity at 250 copies/spot (5000 copies/mL). However, the 95% limit of detection values were significantly different (293.7 copies/mL for whole blood and 2384 copies/mL for dried blood spot specimens). No significant effect on analytical sensitivity was observed when one HIV-1 positive dried blood spot punch was pooled with up to 9 HIV-1 negative dried blood spot punches. Together, these studies demonstrate that the APTIMA HIV-1 RNA Qualitative Assay can be used to process a diverse array of specimen types with minimal impact on analytical sensitivity for most specimen types. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available