4.6 Article

Multi-objective optimization for actuator and sensor layouts of actively controlled 3D buildings

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 942-960

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1077546311430105

Keywords

Actuators; multi-objective genetic algorithm; optimal placement; sensors

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [0238654]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0238654] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the multi-objective optimization of active control systems for vibration control of three-dimensional (3D) high-rise buildings under a variety of earthquake excitations. To this end, a novel multi-objective genetic algorithm is developed through the integration of the best features of a non-dominated sorting II (NS2) genetic algorithm (GA) and an implicit redundant representation (IRR) GA. The proposed NS2-IRR GA finds not only minimum distributions of both actuators and sensors within structures, but also minimum dynamic responses of 3D structures. Linear quadratic Gaussian controllers, hydraulic actuators and accelerometers are used for implementation of active control systems within the 3D buildings. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed NS2-IRR GA, two 3D building models are investigated using finite element methods, including low-and high-rise buildings. It is shown that the proposed NS2-IRR GA is effective in finding not only optimal locations and numbers of both actuators and sensors in 3D buildings, but also minimum responses of the 3D buildings. The simulation also shows that the control performances of the proposed approach significantly enhance those of the engineering judgment oriented benchmark layout, which is validated by comparisons of each performance using the same number of actuators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available