4.5 Article

Applying lean thinking in the food supply chains: a case study

Journal

PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL
Volume 26, Issue 16, Pages 1351-1367

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2015.1049238

Keywords

lean thinking; lean action plan; tea industry; case research; action research; value; value stream; waste reduction; SMEs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the study was to examine the adoption and implementation of lean thinking in food supply chains. Since the majority of food companies are small and medium enterprises (SMEs), a lean action plan was developed taking into account the particularities of SMEs. The methodology used was a case study research of a UK tea company. An action research approach was adopted to study the lean process and diagnose the problems which occurred during lean implementation. This study developed a lean action plan with three stages: (a) planning for lean; (b) interim lean diagnosis and (c) lean operations and control. The first stage includes the following steps: find a change agent, get the knowledge, find a lever and suspend grand strategy. Interim lean diagnosis revealed issues with top management support, expert knowledge and operational easiness. The last stage, lean operations and control, includes the following steps: (i) re-define value, (ii) map process activities and value streams, (iii) detect waste, (iv) develop an ideal state of production and supply chain operations and (v) control lean operations. The potential contribution of lean food small and medium companies can be enormous given the percentage of food waste across supply chains. The contribution of this study is threefold: (a) it develops a new lean action plan for small and medium companies; (b) it sheds light on how lean thinking can be applied in the food sector and can achieve substantial waste reductions; (c) it tests a unique reflecting methodology using action case research to gather, interpret and develop reflective learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available