4.3 Article

Pathotyping avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strains in Korea

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 145-152

Publisher

KOREAN SOC VETERINARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2012.13.2.145

Keywords

avian pathogenic Escherichia coli; genotype; serotyping; virulence genes

Funding

  1. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries [105110-02-1-SB010]
  2. Small and Medium Business Administration, Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the genetic background of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) that affects virulence of this microorganism, we characterized the virulence genes of 101 APEC strains isolated from infected chickens between 1985 similar to 2005. Serotypes were determined with available anti-sera and median lethal doses were determined in subcutaneously inoculated chicks. The virulence genes we tested included ones encoding type 1 fimbriae (fimC), iron uptake-related (iroN, irp2, iucD, and fyuA), toxins (It, st, stx1, stx2, and vat), and other factors (tsh, hlyF, ompT, and iss). Twenty-eight strains were found to be O1 (2.0%), O18(3.0%), O20(1.0%), O78 (19.8%), and 0115 (2.0%) serotypes. The iroN (100%) gene was observed most frequently followed by ompT (94.1 %), fimC (90.1%), hlyF (87.1 %), iss (78.2%), iucD (73.3%), tsh (61.4 %), fyuA (44.6%), and irp2 (43.6%). The strains were negative for all toxin genes except for vat (10.9%). All the strains were classified into 27 molecular pathotypes (MPs). The MP25, MP19, and MP10 pathotypes possessing iroN-fimC-ompT-hlyF-iucD-tsh-iss-irp2-fyuA (22.8%), iroN-fimC-ompT-hlyF-iucD-tsh-iss (21.8%), and iroN-fimC-ompT-hlyF-iss (11.9%) genotypes, respectively, were predominant. Redundancy of iron uptake-related genes was clearly observed and some strains were associated with higher mortality than others. Therefore, strains with the predominant genotypes can be used for diagnosis and vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available