4.4 Article

Clinicopathological Variables Predicting Progression of Azotemia in Cats with Chronic Kidney Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 275-281

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.00874.x

Keywords

Anemia; Hyperphosphatemia; Nephrology; Proteinuria

Funding

  1. Vetoquinol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in geriatric cats, but often appears to be stable for long periods of time. Objectives: To describe CKD progression and identify risk factors for progression in newly diagnosed azotemic cats. Animals: A total of 213 cats with CKD (plasma creatinine concentration >2 mg/dL, urine specific gravity <1.035) were followed up until progression occurred or for at least 1 year; 132, 73, and 8 cats were in International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Methods: Progression was defined as a 25% increase in plasma creatinine concentration. Logistic regression was used to assess variables at diagnosis that were associated with progression within 1 year. Changes in IRIS stage during followup also were described. Cases that remained in stages 2 or 3, but did not have renal function assessed in the last 60 days of life, were excluded from analysis of the proportion reaching stage 4. Results: Of the cats, 47% (101) progressed within 1 year of diagnosis. High plasma phosphate concentration and high urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC) predicted progression in all cats. Low PCV and high UPC independently predicted progression in stage 2 cats, whereas higher plasma phosphate concentration predicted progression in stage 3 cats; 19% (18/94) of cats diagnosed in stage 2; and 63% (34/54) of cats diagnosed in stage 3 reached stage 4 before they died. Conclusions: Proteinuria, anemia, and hyperphosphatemia may reflect more progressive kidney disease. Alternatively, they may be markers for mechanisms of progression such as tubular protein overload, hypoxia, and nephrocalcinosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available