4.4 Article

Ivermectin and Milbemycin Oxime in Experimental Adult Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) Infection of Dogs

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 61-64

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0657.x

Keywords

Canine; Chemoprophylaxis; Effectiveness; Macrocyclic lactone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The US Food and Drug Administration reports an increase in the frequency of reports of lack of effectiveness claims for heartworm (HW) prevention products. Hypothesis At their labeled doses, single doses of commercially available HW prevention products are not completely effective against all field isolates of HW. Animals Forty-two HW-free dogs experimentally inoculated with a recent HW field isolate. Methods Placebo-controlled, blinded laboratory clinical trial. Dogs randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups with 14 dogs per group. Groups were untreated control or PO dosed with milbemycin oxime (MBO) or ivermectin (IVM). Dogs were inoculated with 50 HW third stage larvae 30 days before dosing and necropsy was performed on Day 123 after treatment to enumerate adult HW. Results Thirteen of 14 control dogs had adult HW detected at necropsy with a geometric mean worm count of 22.3. One HW was found in 1 dog in each of the MBO and IVM treatment groups. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Two currently approved macrocyclic lactone HW preventives used at their labeled dose rates were < 100% effective against a recent HW field isolate, supporting the hypothesis that the effectiveness of a single dose of these preventives can vary. This is important in guiding clients on expectations of product effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available