4.4 Article

Salivary Cortisol Concentrations in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Hypercortisolism

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 551-556

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0494.x

Keywords

Canine; Saliva; Steroid hormones

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Measurement of salivary cortisol is a useful diagnostic test for hypercortisolism (HC) in humans. Objectives To determine whether measurement of salivary cortisol concentration is a practical alternative to plasma cortisol to diagnose HC, to validate the use of salivary cortisol, and to examine the effect of time of day and sampling location on salivary cortisol. Animals Thirty healthy dogs and 6 dogs with HC. Methods Prospective, observational clinical trial including healthy volunteer dogs and dogs newly diagnosed with HC. Salivary and plasma cortisol concentrations were measured with an immunoassay analyzer. Intra- and interassay variability, linearity, and correlation between salivary and plasma cortisol concentrations were determined. Results The required 300 mu L of saliva could not be obtained in 88/326 samples from healthy dogs and in 15/30 samples from dogs with HC. The intra-assay variability for measurement of salivary cortisol was 5-17.7%, the interassay variability 8.5 and 17.3%, and the observed to expected ratio 89-125%. The correlation (r) between salivary and plasma cortisol was 0.98. The time of day and location of collection did not affect salivary cortisol concentrations. Dogs with HC had significantly higher salivary cortisol values than healthy dogs (10.2 +/- 7.3 nmol/L versus 1.54 +/- 0.97 nmol/L; P < .001). Conclusions and Clinical Importance The ROCHE Elecsys immunoassay analyzer correctly measured salivary cortisol in dogs. However, a broad clinical application of the method seems limited, because of the large sample volume required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available