4.4 Article

Uveal Inflammation in Septic Newborn Foals

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 391-397

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0452.x

Keywords

Chorioretinitis; Equine; Eye; Neonate; Sepsis; Survival indicator; Uveitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Septicemia in humans is described as a leading cause of uveitis, which eventually can induce blindness. Hypothesis/Objectives Uveal inflammatory findings could be related to sepsis severity in newborn foals and might be used as an indirect indicator for survival. Animals Seventy-four septic foals, 54 nonseptic foals, and 42 healthy foals. Methods Prospective observational clinical study. A detailed blinded, ophthalmic examination was performed by boarded ophthalmologists on all admitted newborn foals. Foals were grouped as septic (when blood culture resulted positive or the sepsis score was >= 14), nonseptic, and controls. Based on blood culture results, the septic group was subdivided into bacteremic and nonbacteremic foals. Results Blood culture was performed in 62/74 septic foals, from which 35 (56%) were bacteremic and 27 (44%) were nonbacteremic. Anterior uveitis was diagnosed in a significantly (P < .005) higher number of septic/bacteremic foals (14/35, 40%) than in septic/nonbacteremic foals (5/27, 19%), nonseptic foals (4/54, 7%), and control foals (0%). Anterior chamber fibrin was only observed in 4/14 (29%) septic/bacteremic foals with anterior uveitis. Anterior uveitis was also associated with posterior uveitis in 6/35 (19%) septic/bacteremic foals. The diagnosis of uveitis was related to nonsurvival (P = .001, odds ratio = 6.2, 95% confidence interval = 2.1-18.2). Conclusions and Clinical Importance Anterior uveitis is highly prevalent in septic newborn foals, especially in those with a positive blood culture, and it should be considered as a survival prognostic factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available