4.4 Article

Comparison of 2 Doses of Recombinant Human Thyrotropin for Thyroid Function Testing in Healthy and Suspected Hypothyroid Dogs

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 856-861

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0336.x

Keywords

Diagnosis; Hypothyroidism; rhTSH; Stimulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Various protocols using different doses of recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) in TSH stimulation testing have been described. However, the influence of TSH dosage on thyroxine (T4) concentration has not yet been evaluated in suspected hypothyroid dogs. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of 2 doses of rhTSH. Animals Fifteen dogs with clinical signs consistent with hypothyroidism and abnormal stimulation results with 75 mu g rhTSH and 18 clinically healthy dogs. Methods All dogs were stimulated with 75 and 150 mu g rhTSH IV in a 1st and 2nd stimulation test, respectively. Blood samples were taken before and 6 hours after rhTSH administration for determination of total T4 concentration. Results Using the higher dose led to a normal test interpretation in 9 of the 15 dogs, in which stimulation had been abnormal using the lower dose. Based on follow-up information, hypothyroidism was excluded in 7 of these 9 dogs. In all 6 dogs with a blunted response to the higher dose, hypothyroidism could be confirmed. Healthy dogs showed significantly higher post-TSH T4 concentrations with the higher compared with the lower dose. Post-TSH T4 concentrations after TSH stimulation were not related to dogs' body weight in either healthy or diseased dogs. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance TSH dose significantly influenced test interpretation in suspected hypothyroid dogs. Differentiation between primary hypothyroidism and nonthyroidal disease was improved with 150 mu g rhTSH. Because this effect was independent of the dogs' body weight, the higher dose is recommended in dogs that have concurrent disease or are receiving medication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available