4.2 Article

Detection of all eight serotypes of Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 220-225

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/104063870902100207

Keywords

Bluetongue virus; Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus; real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service [5410-32000-011-00D, 5410-32000-016-00D]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P20 RR016474]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) has been associated with bluetongue-like disease ill cattle. Although U.S. EHDV strains have not been experimentally proven to cause disease in cattle, there is serologic evidence of infection. Differentiation of Bluetongue virus (BTV) and EHDV is necessary because diagnosis of infection caused by these viruses is often confused. The previously developed nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR) test for indigenous EHDV disease is sensitive and specific, but it is prone to contamination problems. Additionally, the EHDV nRT-PCR only detects 7 of the 8 serotypes. To develop all improved diagnostic test, sequence analysis was performed on 2 conserved target genes; one is highly expressed in infected mammalian cells, whereas the other is highly expressed in infected insect cells. This information was used to develop a rapid EHDV real-time PCR that detects all 8 EHDV serotypes. The EHDV assay did not cross-react with BTV strains and performed similarly to the nRT-PCR tests with archived clinical samples. In addition, it is superior to the nRT-PCR, not only because it is a closed system with fewer cross-contamination problems, but also because it detects all 8 serotypes and is less labor and time intensive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available