4.1 Article

A sand tiger shark-dominated fauna from the Eocene Arctic greenhouse

Journal

JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 1307-1316

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2014.880446

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ARC 0804627]
  2. National Geographic Society (Committee for Research and Exploration)
  3. University of Colorado Museum of Natural History (Clark Fellowship)
  4. University of Colorado Museum of Natural History (Collie Fund)
  5. Adams County Historical Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a new shark fauna from Canada's westernmost Arctic island, Banks Island, Northwest Territories, based upon thousands of shark teeth recovered from lower-middle Eocene sediments of the Cyclic Member (Eureka Sound Formation) on northern Banks Island, Northwest Territories (similar to 74 degrees N latitude). Based upon palynology, the sediments preserving the shark teeth are late early to middle Eocene in age and likely span the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO). The low-diversity faunal assemblage is dominated by the sand tiger sharks Striatolamia and Carcharias, but also includes relatively rare teeth of the carcharhinid Physogaleus (extinct relative of sharpnose and tiger sharks) and very rare teeth of the odontaspidid Odontaspis winkleri. We also report the occurrence of the ray Myliobatis. Based upon analogy with extant Carcharias taurus and Myliobatis, the presence of Carcharias and Myliobatis on northern Banks Island corroborates the relatively warm sea surface temperatures estimated by others for the Eocene Arctic Ocean. We hypothesize that the low diversity of the Banks Island shark fauna, in comparison with other early Eocene brackish, shallow-marine chondrichthyan assemblages such as the Abbey Wood (U.K.) fauna, is probably due to environmental factors, including reduced salinity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available