4.5 Article

Ants accelerate succession from mountain grassland towards spruce forest

Journal

JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 577-587

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01077.x

Keywords

Anthills; Chronosequence; Disturbance; Lasius flavus; Mowing; Permanent plot

Funding

  1. GA CR [526/06/0818]
  2. [MSM 0021620828]
  3. [MK00002327201]
  4. [AV0Z60050516]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Question What is the role of mound-building ants (Lasius flavus) in successional changes of a grassland ecosystem towards a spruce forest? Location Slovenske Rudohorie Mountains, Slovakia; ca. 950 m a.s.l. near the Obrubovanec point (1020 m a.s.l.; 48 degrees 41'N, 19 degrees 39'E). Methods Both chronosequence data along a successional gradient and temporal data from long-term permanent plots were collected on ants, spruce establishment, and vegetation structure, together with additional data on spruce growth. Results There are more spruce seedlings on ant mounds (4.72 m(-2)) than in the surrounding vegetation (0.81 m(-2)). Spruce seedlings grow faster on these mounds compared to surrounding areas. The first colonization wave of seedlings was rapid and probably occurred when grazing prevailed over mowing. Ant colony presence, mound volume, and plant species composition change along the successional gradient. Mounds become bigger when partly shaded but shrink in closed forest, when ant colonies disappear. Shade-tolerant acidophylic species replace grassland plants both on the mounds and in surrounding areas. Conclusions The massive occurrence of Lasius flavus anthills contributes to a runaway feedback process that accelerates succession towards forest. The effect of ants as ecosystem engineers is scale-dependent: although they stabilize the system at the scale of an individual mound, they may destabilize the whole grassland system over a longer time scale if combined with changes in mowing regime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available