4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Socioeconomic and hospital-related predictors of amputation for critical limb ischemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 330-339

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.08.077

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K23 HL084386, K06 HL000734, T32 HL007734, T32 HL007734-11, K23 HL084386-01, T32 HL00734] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Disparities in limb salvage procedures may be driven by socioeconomic status (SES) and access to high-volume hospitals. We sought to identify SES factors associated with major amputation in the setting of critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods: The 2003-2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for discharges containing lower extremity revascularization (LER) or major amputation and chronic CLI (N = 958,120). The Elixhauser method was used to adjust for comorbidities. Significant predictors in bivariate logistic regression were entered into a multivariate logistic regression for the dependent variable of amputation vs LER. Results: Overall, 24.2% of CLI patients underwent amputation. Significant differences were seen between both groups in bivariate and multivariate analysis of SES factors, including race, income, and insurance status. Lower-income patients were more likely to be treated at low-LER-volume institutions (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; P < .001). Patients at higher-LER-volume centers (OR, 15.16; P < .001) admitted electively (OR, 2.19; P < .001) and evaluated with diagnostic imaging (OR, 10.63; P < .001) were more likely to receive LER. Conclusions: After controlling for comorbidities, minority patients, those with lower SES, and patients with Medicaid were more likely receive amputation for CLI in low-volume hospitals. Addressing SES and hospital factors may reduce amputation rates for CLI. (J Vasc Surg 2011;53:330-9.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available