4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Long-term results of open and endovascular revascularization of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 714-721

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.216

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: First-line treatment for patients with superficial femoral arterial (SFA) occlusive disease has yet to be determined. This study compared long-term outcomes between primary SFA stent placement and primary femoral-popliteal bypass. Periprocedural patient factors were examined to determine their effect on these results. Methods: All femoral-popliteal bypasses and SFA interventions performed in consecutive patients with symptoms Rutherford 3 to 6 between 2001 and 2008 were reviewed. Time-dependent outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards were performed to determine predictors of graft patency. Multivariate analysis was completed to identify patient covariates most often associated with the primary therapy. Results: A total of 152 limbs in 141 patients (66% male; mean age, 66 +/- 22 years) underwent femoral-popliteal bypass, and 233 limbs in 204 patients (49% male; mean age, 70 +/- 11 years) underwent SFA interventions. Four-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 69%, 78%, and 83%, respectively, for bypass patients and 66%, 91%, and 95%, respectively, for SFA interventions. Six-year limb salvage was 80% for bypass vs 92% for stenting (P = .04). Critical limb ischemia (CLI) and renal insufficiency were predictors of bypass failure. Claudication was a predictor of success for SFA stenting. Three-year limb salvage rates for CLI patients undergoing surgery and SFA stenting were 83%. Amputation-free survival at 3 years for CLI patients was 55% for bypass and 59% for SFA interventions. Multivariate predictors (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals) of covariates most frequently associated with first-line SFA stenting were TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II A and B lesions (5.9 [3.4-9.1], P <.001), age >70 years (2.1 [1.4-3.1], P <.001), and claudication (1.7 [1.1-2.7], P = .01). Regarding bypass as first-line therapy, claudicant patients were more likely to have nondiabetic status (5.6 [3.3-9.4], P < .001), creatinine <1.8 mg/dL (4.6 [1.5-14.9], P =.01), age <70 years (2.7 [CI, 1.6-8.3], P <.001), and presence of an above-knee popliteal artery target vessel (1.9 [CI, 1.1-3.4] P=.02). Conclusion: Indication, patient-specific covariates, and anatomic lesion classification have significant association when determining surgeon selection of SFA stenting or femoral-popliteal bypass as first-line therapy. Patients with SPA disease can have comparable long-term results when treatment options are well matched to patient-specific and anatomic characteristics. (J Vase Surg 2011;54:714-21.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available