4.5 Article

Verification of cardiac mechanics software: benchmark problems and solutions for testing active and passivematerial behaviour

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2015.0641

Keywords

cardiac mechanics; verification; benchmark; VVUQ

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J017272/1]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL103428, DP1 HL123271, R01 HL117063, P50 GM071558]
  3. National Science Foundation [IOS-1124804, ACI 1460334, DMS 1460368]
  4. British Heart Foundation [PG/14/64/31043, PG\13\37\30280]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I029990, EP/M012492/1]
  6. B.O.F. (Ghent University)
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [F3210-N18]
  8. European Union [611232]
  9. King's College London Graduate School Award
  10. Chilean Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (FONDECYT) [11121224]
  11. Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  12. King's College London
  13. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  14. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [F 3201] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J017272/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. British Heart Foundation [PG/14/64/31043] Funding Source: researchfish
  17. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H019898/1, EP/M012492/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  18. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)
  19. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1450327, 1460334] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  20. BBSRC [BB/J017272/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  21. EPSRC [EP/M012492/1, EP/I029990/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Models of cardiac mechanics are increasingly used to investigate cardiac physiology. These models are characterized by a high level of complexity, including the particular anisotropic material properties of biological tissue and the actively contracting material. A large number of independent simulation codes have been developed, but a consistent way of verifying the accuracy and replicability of simulations is lacking. To aid in the verification of current and future cardiac mechanics solvers, this study provides three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics. These benchmark problems test the ability to accurately simulate pressure-type forces that depend on the deformed objects geometry, anisotropic and spatially varying material properties similar to those seen in the left ventricle and active contractile forces. The benchmark was solved by 11 different groups to generate consensus solutions, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%, and consistent results between linear, quadratic and cubic finite elements as well as different approaches to simulating incompressible materials. Online tools and solutions are made available to allow these tests to be effectively used in verification of future cardiac mechanics software.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available