4.8 Article

Increased threat of tropical cyclones and coastal flooding to New York City during the anthropogenic era

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1513127112

Keywords

tropical cyclones; flood height; storm surge; relative sea level; New Jersey

Funding

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [424-18 45GZ, NA11OAR4310101]
  2. National Science Foundation [OCE 1458904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a changing climate, future inundation of the United States' Atlantic coast will depend on both storm surges during tropical cyclones and the rising relative sea levels on which those surges occur. However, the observational record of tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic basin is too short (A.D. 1851 to present) to accurately assess long-term trends in storm activity. To overcome this limitation, we use proxy sea level records, and downscale three CMIP5 models to generate large synthetic tropical cyclone data sets for the North Atlantic basin; driving climate conditions span from A.D. 850 to A.D. 2005. We compare pre-anthropogenic era (A.D. 850-1800) and anthropogenic era (A.D. 1970-2005) storm surge model results for New York City, exposing links between increased rates of sea level rise and storm flood heights. We find that mean flood heights increased by similar to 1.24 m (due mainly to sea level rise) from similar to A.D. 850 to the anthropogenic era, a result that is significant at the 99% confidence level. Additionally, changes in tropical cyclone characteristics have led to increases in the extremes of the types of storms that create the largest storm surges for New York City. As a result, flood risk has greatly increased for the region; for example, the 500-y return period for a similar to 2.25-m flood height during the pre-anthropogenic era has decreased to similar to 24.4 y in the anthropogenic era. Our results indicate the impacts of climate change on coastal inundation, and call for advanced risk management strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available