4.4 Article

Arterial Versus Portal Venous Embolization for Induction of Hepatic Hypertrophy before Extended Right Hemihepatectomy in Hilar Cholangiocarcinomas: A Prospective Randomized Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1254-1262

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.04.014

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of portal vein (PV) embolization versus hepatic artery embolization (HAE) for induction of hepatic hypertrophy before extended right hemihepatectomy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients (female, n = 15; male, n = 35; age range, 37-80 y) with hilar cholangiocarcinomas who were planned to undergo extended right hemihepatectomy were prospectively included in 2003-2006. In addition to biliary decompression of the left liver, patients were randomized to undergo embolization of the right hepatic artery (with transfemoral access and polyvinyl alcohol [PVA] particles plus coils) or right PV branches (with computed tomography [CT]-guided transhepatic access and PVA particles). CT was performed before and approximately 3 weeks after embolization for volumetric assessment of the liver. Results: In the HAE group, median growth of the left lateral segments was 40 mL (P < .01), with a median reduction of the whole liver of 10 mL (P = .41); adverse events were observed in two of 25 patients (8%), who each developed an abscess in the right liver lobe. In the PV embolization group, median growth of the left lateral segments was 110 mL (P < .01), with a median growth of the whole liver of 10 mL (P = .92); a subcapsular seroma occurred in one of 25 patients (4%). The median growth of the left lateral segments after PV embolization was significantly greater than after HAE (P = .004). Conclusions: Compared with HAE, PV embolization was significantly superior regarding induction of hepatic hypertrophy of the left lateral segments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available