4.8 Article

Cross-immunity between strains explains the dynamical pattern of paramyxoviruses

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516698112

Keywords

paramyxoviruses; respiratory syncytial viruses; human parainfluenza; pathogen interactions; cross-immunity

Funding

  1. University of Utah Funding Incentive SEED Grant
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Grant [K08 HS018538]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  4. Research and Policy for Infectious Disease Dynamics (RAPIDD) Program of the Science and Technology Directorate
  5. Department of Homeland Security
  6. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health
  7. James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Viral respiratory tract diseases pose serious public health problems. Our ability to predict and thus, be able to prepare for outbreaks is strained by the complex factors driving the prevalence and severity of these diseases. The abundance of diseases and transmission dynamics of strains are not only affected by external factors, such as weather, but also driven by interactions among viruses mediated by human behavior and immunity. To untangle the complex out-of-phase annual and biennial pattern of three common paramyxoviruses, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Human Parainfluenza Virus (HPIV), and Human Metapneumovirus (hMPV), we adopt a theoretical approach that integrates ecological and immunological mechanisms of disease interactions. By estimating parameters from multiyear time series of laboratory-confirmed cases from the intermountain west region of the United States and using statistical inference, we show that models of immune-mediated interactions better explain the data than those based on ecological competition by convalescence. The strength of cross-protective immunity among viruses is correlated with their genetic distance in the phylogenetic tree of the paramyxovirus family.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available