4.5 Article

Correlation of chemical composition and electrical properties of rf sputtered alumina films

Journal

JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 234-244

Publisher

A V S AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1116/1.3065978

Keywords

alumina; atomic force microscopy; chemical analysis; electric breakdown; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; high-k dielectric thin films; leakage currents; permittivity; sputter deposition; surface morphology

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alumina films were prepared by radio frequency magnetron sputtering from an aluminum oxide target on an indium tin oxide covered glass. The purpose of the study was to test the influence of the sputter parameters on the elemental composition, surface morphology, and electrical insulation properties (breakdown fields and leakage currents). Tested parameters were the sputter gas (Ar) pressure, the sputter rate, the sputter power, the sputter gas composition (Ar:O-2), the conditioning of the target, the residual base pressure, and the substrate temperature. The surface morphology of the films was investigated by atomic force microscopy. Depth profiles of the elemental compositions were measured by elastic recoil detection using energetic heavy ions, and the insulation properties were investigated by current voltage measurements and impedance spectroscopy. The main finding is that the leakage currents increase by about five orders of magnitude, if the atomic ratio of O:Al increases from 1.35 to 2.0. In parallel the breakdown fields decrease by a factor of 100, and the character of the breakdowns changes from soft to hard. The highest breakdown fields (2.4 MV/cm) and smallest leakage currents (6.5x10(-8) A/cm(2) at 2.0 MV/cm) are obtained for slightly Al rich films with small atomic concentrations of H (< 0.5 at. %). These films were sputtered in pure Ar and under the lowest possible pressure of the residual gas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available