4.8 Article

The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 represses endogenous and exogenous retroviruses in B lymphocytes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422187112

Keywords

epigenetics; histone methylation; repression; transposable elements; retroviruses

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [P30 CA91842]
  2. Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS/CTSA) from the National Center for Research Resources [UL1TR000448]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AI 079732, AI 118852, AI 097244]
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20062005]
  5. NIH [T32 AI 7163-34]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20062005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome stability relies on epigenetic mechanisms that enforce repression of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). Current evidence suggests that distinct chromatin-based mechanisms repress ERVs in cells of embryonic origin (histone methylation dominant) vs. more differentiated cells (DNA methylation dominant). However, the latter aspect of this model has not been tested. Remarkably, and in contrast to the prevailing model, we find that repressive histone methylation catalyzed by the enzyme SETDB1 is critical for suppression of specific ERV families and exogenous retroviruses in committed B-lineage cells from adult mice. The profile of ERV activation in SETDB1-deficient B cells is distinct from that observed in corresponding embryonic tissues, despite the loss of repressive chromatin modifications at all ERVs. We provide evidence that, on loss of SETDB1, ERVs are activated in a lineage-specific manner depending on the set of transcription factors available to target proviral regulatory elements. These findings have important implications for genome stability in somatic cells, as well as the interface between epigenetic repression and viral latency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available