4.8 Article

Ventral striatal dopamine reflects behavioral and neural signatures of model-based control during sequential decision making

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1417219112

Keywords

dopamine; decision making; reinforcement learning; PET; fMRI

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)] [SCHL 1969/1-1, DFG SCHL1969/2-1, DFG HE2597/14-1, DFG FOR 1617]
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. German Research Foundation [DFG RA1047/2-1, GRK 1123/2]
  4. Wellcome Trust [098362/Z/12/Z]
  5. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GQ0411, 01QG87164]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual system theories suggest that behavioral control is parsed between a deliberative model-based and a more reflexive model-free system. A balance of control exerted by these systems is thought to be related to dopamine neurotransmission. However, in the absence of direct measures of human dopamine, it remains unknown whether this reflects a quantitative relation with dopamine either in the striatum or other brain areas. Using a sequential decision task performed during functional magnetic resonance imaging, combined with striatal measures of dopamine using [F-18]DOPA positron emission tomography, we show that higher presynaptic ventral striatal dopamine levels were associated with a behavioral bias toward more model-based control. Higher presynaptic dopamine in ventral striatum was associated with greater coding of model-based signatures in lateral prefrontal cortex and diminished coding of model-free prediction errors in ventral striatum. Thus, interindividual variability in ventral striatal presynaptic dopamine reflects a balance in the behavioral expression and the neural signatures of model-free and model-based control. Our data provide a novel perspective on how alterations in presynaptic dopamine levels might be accompanied by a disruption of behavioral control as observed in aging or neuropsychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia and addiction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available